Choose the topic from given list Research Paper

Pick the subject from given rundown - Research Paper Example There is by all accounts a developing commotion for school outfits in the state funded schools for some issue. One reason introduced by those supporting the unforms in government funded schools has to do with the expense of school apparel. Perhaps the biggest cost that guardians face as far as the everyday needs of their secondary school matured kids has to do with the garments that they wear to class ordinary. The expanding cost of prepared to wear garments and the craving of kids to wear one of a kind get-ups to class cost the guardians a decent amount of cash each school year. By forcing an obligatory school uniform strategy in our schools, the expense of instruction can be brought down for guardians. This paper means to introduce three reasons regarding why we should bolster the clatter for regalia in state funded schools , remembering the reserve funds for cost of garments that can be given to the guardians, while likewise presentingsome of the reasons that a few guardians and u nderstudies restrict the school uniform approach. One reason that secondary school understudies give when inquired as to why the help the school uniform strategy is that they think that its simpler to just wear a similar garments to class regular. In spite of the fact that youngsters love to spruce up and coordinate their outfits for a day out, doing that consistently for school garments turns into an aggravation for them. Subsequently school garbs can really enable the children to get the chance to class on schedule and the guardians additionally get a couple of additional minutes regularly with which they can do different things simultaneously. In spite of open conviction, secondary school understudies loath being late for class. They additionally like to not need to consider what they will be wearing the following day to class. The thinking is straightforward: It spares them from going out and purchase garments in light of the fact that a uniform can be sent to you. Choices donâ €™t must be made on the grounds that you wear a similar outfit each day. All children need to do is get their uniform and you don’t need to stress on the off chance that it matches or in the event that it doesn’t coordinate. (Whelan, Brittany â€Å"School Uniforms Save Money, Avoid Problems†) As anyone who at any point went to secondary school knows, these understudies are decided by their friends at this level essential through early introductions. Those initial introductions are first made by the garments that an understudy wears to class. This need to dress in what an understudy accepts to be a worthy way to his companions at that point winds up causing the understudy undue pressure. Not every person can stand to purchase the most recent pattern in dress and architect duds so on account of such understudies, a school uniform will work best. School regalia are additionally seen as the incredible equalizer as a rule. Since understudies dress the same nearby , this can really assist with lessening the instances of harassing, terrorizing, garments burglaries, and so forth. The explanation that outfits work very well in diminishing the viciousness understudies understanding nearby is that when it turns out to be difficult to look one of a kind, the understudies will in general treat each other reasonably. It is said that regalia are the extraordinary equalizer in light of the fact that; â€Å"Schools are for understudies to learn and not for understudies to be compromised due to what they wear or are not wearing. Outfits will help shield every understudy from wrongdoing and viciousness when at school.† (â€Å"Yes for School Uniforms†). Regular citizen school garments that secondary school understudies wear to class can cost guardians as much as over a thousand dollars in a year because of the steady need to change the garments with

Heineken in Cambodia Free Essays

Heineken Overview of disputable strategic approaches in 2008 Sanne van der Wal Rob Bleijerveld April 2009 Heineken Overview of questionable strategic policies in 2008 Sanne van der Wal Rob Bleijerveld Amsterdam, April 2009 Heineken Overview of dubious strategic policies in 2008 Colophon Heineken Overview of questionable strategic policies in 2008 April 2009 By: Sanne van der Wal Rob Bleijerveld Cover Design: Annelies Vlasblom Funding This distribution is made conceivable with co-subsidizing from the Vereniging van Beleggers voor Duurzame Ontwikkeling (VBDO) Published by Stichting Onderzoek Multinationale Ondernemingen Center for Research on Multinational Corporations Sarphatistraat 30 1018 GL Amsterdam The Netherlands Phone: + 31 (20) 6391291 E-mail: info@somo. nl Website: Hwww. somo. We will compose a custom exposition test on Heineken in Cambodia or then again any comparable point just for you Request Now nl This report is authorized under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivateWorks 2. 5 License. 1 Introduction This organization report has been set up by SOMO (Center for Research on Multinational Corporations). It gives a diagram of strategic approaches that could be viewed as impractical or flippant which happened (or may have been tended to) in 2008. The outline underneath depicts just questionable practices and not the positive accomplishments of an organization around the same time. Data on positive accomplishments can for the most part be found in a company’s yearly and additionally maintainability report and on the company’s site. The reason for this report is to give extra data to investors and different partners of an organization on debates that may or probably won't be distinguished and announced by the organization itself. This report doesn't contain an examination of a company’s corporate obligation approaches, operational parts of corporate duty the executives, usage frameworks, announcing and straightforwardness, or all out presentation on any issue. For certain discussions, it is demonstrated which guidelines or strategies may have been abused and a short examination is introduced. Aside from this, the report is primarily enlightening. The scope of manageability and corporate duty issues qualified for incorporation in this diagram is generally wide and basically dependent on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. These Guidelines are utilized as a general edge of reference notwithstanding the organization explicit norms. Wellsprings of data are referenced in commentaries all through the report. The fundamental sources were acquired through SOMO’s worldwide system of common society associations, including reports, different records, and unpublished data. Media and friends data databases and data accessible by means of the Internet are utilized as auxiliary sources where fundamental. Heineken has been educated about the exploration venture ahead of time and was given fourteen days to audit the report and give remedies of any real blunders in the draft variant. The review of disputable practices in this report isn't expected to be thorough. Rather, it centers around a predetermined number of issues and cases that may justify further consideration or reflection. Where data about the most recent turns of events, either positive or negative, was inaccessible, it is conceivable that circumstances portrayed in the diagram have as of late changed. Considering these impediments, SOMO accepts that the report can be utilized for development and for an increasingly educated evaluation regarding a company’s corporate duty execution. For more data, if you don't mind contact SOMO: SOMO (Center for Research on Multinational Corporations) Sarphatistraat 30, 1018 GL Amsterdam, The Netherlands Tel. 31 (0)20 6391291 Fax +31 (0)20 6391391 email: info@somo. nl site: www. somo. nl 2 Heineken Overview of disputable strategic approaches in 2008 Precarious working states of Heineken Beer venders in Cambodia This short outline manages just one issue: the proceeding with awful work and wellbeing states of socalled ‘beer sellers’ in Cambodia, salaried ladies who wear unmistakable Heineken regalia while only selling Heineken lager in bars and café s, nearby those working for its somewhat claimed accomplice brands (e. . , Tiger, ABC, etc†¦), and for contenders. The work states of these ladies, who are employed by the vast majority of the worldwide brewers and their wholesalers working in Cambodia 1 , have been reprimanded for quite a long while, by the Cambodian NGO (Non-Governmental Organization ) Siem Reap Citizens for Health, Educational and Social Issues (SiRCHESI) 2 . In 2002 the CEO and the Boards of both Heineken Breweries Ltd and Heineken Holding N. V. from here: Heineken) were first advised by SiRCHESI of worries about the wellbeing and government assistance of their brew merchants, who proceeded, in 2008, to be at high hazard for HIV/AIDS and liquor related medical issues, who experience inappropriate behavior and viciousness at their work environments, and who are not paid a ‘living wage’-a pay for an all day work on which they can bolster themselves and their family wards. Press reports returning to 1998, and especially a story in the Wall Street Journal (2000) had as of now plainly depicted the issues before social researchers started efficient information assortment. Additionally SOMO’s diagram of dubious strategic approaches of Heineken during 2006 for VBDO of April 2007 has pointed out this basic issue. 4 Recent requests and research in Cambodia â€as part of a longitudinal report (2004-2009) 5 †reconfirm that these awful work and wellbeing conditions despite everything exist. Heineken †and different brands, with whom the two of them contend and co-work †have not gained critical ground in 2007, nor in 2008 to diminish the high dangers to the wellbeing and security of the ladies lager dealers in Cambodia nor meet their month to month budgetary necessities. Up until now, industry endeavors to determine these issues †through the development in late 2006 of â€Å"Beer Selling Industry Cambodia† as an expert brewers relationship with a set of principles (COC) for lager venders †have fizzled. 1 2 3 4 5 See e. g. â€Å"Heineken en promotiemeisjes in Cambodja †deel A,† R. Feilzer and F. P. van der Putten (p. 85-96) and F. P. van der Putten, â€Å" †deel B† (p. 109-13), in: Bedrijfsgevallen, Eds. W Dubbink and H. van Luijk (Assen: Van Gorcum, 2006). SiRCHESI site, . also, ,, and . SiRCHESI’s site http://www. fairtradebeer. com press reports area. Heineken †Overview of disputable strategic policies in 2006,† Francis Weyzig (SOMO), April 2007 Performed by Staff, volunteers ,scientists and understudies situated in Siem Reap with SiRCHESI, or at Siem Reap Provincial AIDS Office, of University of Guelph (CA), National Center in HIV Social Research (University of New South Wales, AU), Macqua rie University (Sydney, AU), University of Melbourne (AU), Australia Volunteers International, Duke University (North Carolina, US), Oxford University (Oxford, UK), University of Technology Sydney (AU), as welll as University of Maastricht, NL, National University of Singapore, and Staffordshire University (UK). Information and examinations were given through Ian Lubek, worldwide counsel to SiRCHESI. The SIRCHESI interviews with lager dealers were directed either in the working environments or during wellbeing workshops. 213 meetings were directed from 2004-6, and 324 from 2007-9. 22 lager dealers worked for Heineken and accomplice brands, 57 worked for Carlsberg brands, for example, Angkor; 56 sold AB-INBEV brands, 1 sold a SAB-Miller brand, and the staying 201 sold different brands including Dutch brands Bavaria, Hollandia, just as Corona, San Miguel, Singha, Oettinger, Asahi, and so forth 3 Below, some questionable parts of the circumstance in 2008, uncovered by SiRCHESI, are portrayed. More foundation information can be found on the SiRCHESI site devoted to this issue www. ethicalbeer. com. On a similar site all the more new subtleties on the longitudinal examination, including information for 2008-9, are distributed by SiRCHESI 6 too. Low pay and straightforwardness As in 2006, SiRCHESI look into 7 affirms that Heineken isn't paying a â€Å"living wage† in 2008. In the event that Heineken and its Asia Pacific Breweries accomplice brands (Tiger, ABC, Anchor, Cheers,etc. paid their lager dealers the present business standard (2008) of a little more than 8 US dollar for each brew case as commission, they would acquire †in light of SiRCHESI’s perceptions of deals of multiple cases every night †around 700 US dollars for each month which adds up to around multiple times the current fixed pay. BSIC brand merchants are reliably paid less every month than non-BSIC marks yet progressively sell complex more lager every year 8 . Actually laborers get under 2. 5 percent of the deal, and face serious daily working environment wellbeing and dangers. Some portion of this productivity for Heineken depends on the sellers’ own daily utilization of around 6 percent of deals, which adds damage and hazard to their working circumstance. For various years, Heineken authorities announced paying rewards to the lager servers, yet SiRCHESI interviews demonstrated that from 2002 onwards these were not being gotten by the brew dealers. Indeed in 2008 they revealed getting month to month income of 71 US dollars which is extensively lower than the 84 US dollars detailed by non-BSIC dealers and the 85 US dollars Heineken base camp reports paying 9 . SiRCHESI gauges that 71 US dollar month to month is still not exactly 50% of what might be sufficient to accommodate them and their family wards. This circumstance of underpayment â€first answered to Heineken officials in 2002 and unaltered since the time puts awful weights on the ladies to help their families and to make a decent living, convincing some to offer perilous sex to clients in distress to suppl

12 Angry Men †Critical Thinkers Essay

In Twelve Angry Men, a youngster is being investigated for wounding and executing his dad. The film centers around twelve arbitrarily chose residents who are appointed the obligation of deciding the destiny of this multi year elderly person. The jury should analyze certain realities and decide reality dependent on the proof introduced to them in court. It is accepted that the legal hearers will judge decently and without individual predisposition. Fundamentally, the members of the jury need to utilize basic speculation during this preliminary to make sense of what proof is accurate and what proof is bogus. All through the film, a few hearers were greater at basic deduction than others, some had obstructions to defeat before they could utilize great basic reasoning aptitudes, but then others became basic masterminds at various focuses during the film. Basic reasoning assumed a key job in Twelve Angry Men. So as to have the option to consider some fresh possibilities, one must have the capacity to think unbiaslly, not bring individual issues into play, not be frightened to put the thoughts and questions on the table, and to be reasonable. The hearer who had these aptitudes the best and applied them better than his eleven different mates was member of the jury number 8, played by Henry Fonda. Toward the start of the film, legal hearer 8 was the just one to cast a ballot not liable on the main vote. Fonda’s character clearly expressed â€Å"It’s difficult for me to lift my hand and send a kid to bite the dust without discussing it first†. This shows he needed to look at all the proof and â€Å"facts† before going to his choice. As the film went on, legal hearer 8 continued suggesting conversation starters like â€Å"could it be possible† and â€Å"could he be wrong† to remind others that about sensible uncertainty. At that point Fonda’s character helped discover gaps in two key bits of proof, one being the blade utilized in the homicide. The switchblade blade should stand-out, yet member of the jury 8 removes a blade from his pocket and sticks it into the table close to t he blade that was utilized in the homicide. The blades were indistinguishable and Fonda’s character clarifies that he got it in a similar neighborhood. The second bit of proof legal hearer 8 discovered sensible uncertainty in was the old man’s declaration. The old cases he heard the executioner shout ‘I’ m going to kill you’, after a second he heard the father’s body fall and he saw the kid coming up short on the house fifteen seconds after. Legal hearer 8 chose to reenact the scene, focusing on detail my hauling his foot like the elderly person, just as, estimating the separation with the goal that it was precise. Fonda’s character demonstrated the old man’s story was bogus in light of the fact that it took thirty-one seconds. Member of the jury 8 payed consideration regarding subtleties, dissected everything about, aside his predispositions, and opened the eyes of different attendants, this is the reason he was an extraordinary basic mastermind. In spite of the fact that there were some acceptable basic scholars in Twelve Angry Men, there were a couple of members of the jury who just couldn’t see fresh until it was past the point of no return. Member of the jury 10 appeared to be the most close disapproved of every one of his companions, bringing about awful basic reasoning. There were occasions where this character generalized the litigant racially by saying â€Å"those people†,†them†, â€Å"they are conceived liars† and â€Å"they don't esteem human life†. Member of the jury 10 likewise alluded to calling the kid oblivious and a lazy pig . This member of the jury treated the litigant inadequately, yet his conduct towards his allies was uninformed. Legal hearer 10 was wry, uncaring, lacking ethics, holding feelings of spite, and a windbag. For example, hearer 10 wryly says â€Å"you’re a brilliant individual aren’t you?† to member of the jury 8 because of a bit of proof that had been destroyed. These attributes are ones that cloud the mind and don't permit sound judgment or basic speculation to become an integral factor. There were three people that held so much grudhe, outrage and hostility that it kept them from intuition basically. One of these companions was member of the jury 3. He guaranteed that the litigant was positively blameworthy and his purposes behind reasoning this was totally bias. He brought musings of outrage, disdain and vengeance into the jury since his own child left him. For this he thinks and accuses every single youthful society. Another jury who was an awful basic mastermind is number 2. He will in general follow the group and feels like its an open and shut case. He doesn’t need to consider the to be as they are nor does he need to tune in to what anybody says. The last hearer who awful at deduction fundamentally was 6. In spite of the fact that he gave legal hearer 8 a possibility, the explanation was on the grounds that he was excessively tight taken to figure off the proof wase. He couldn’t associate any of the spots nor did he shout out particularly in the conversation. Twelve Angry Men had genuine instances of how the normal individual uses basic reasoning, which is whi le the procedure of change is happening? For reasons unknown the light dings on after we tune in to others clarify their considerations. Hearers 9, 11 and 7 resembled the majority of us. During the preliminary member of the jury 9 continued democratic liable until Fonda’s character began discussing the old man’s character and the woman’s visual perception. He casted a ballot not blameworthy after he considered the old man’s character being distant from everyone else, never had acknowledgment in life for anything, and he needed a few so the elderly person lied. Legal hearer 9 needed to beat his own view of himself being old and not so much required for much so as to be a basic mastermind and understand his suppositions check as well. Like legal hearer 9, member of the jury 7 needed to beat his distraction of setting off to a Yankee’s game. All through the film, he continued democratic blameworthy and afterward after he heard attendants 8 and 10 discussion about how the lady wore glasses and she didn’t have them on when she saw the homicide. At the point when this occurred, hearer 7 understood that there was sensible uncertainty for the situation. This just occurs after he casted a ballot not blameworthy just to get this show on the road the ball game and Fonda’s character asks him for what valid reason, which at that point makes 7 focus and think. Attendant 11 was a worker who was frightened and effortlessly influenced by his companions. He had the deterrent of attempting to go to bat for himself, comprehend his voice tallies and that his psyche works simply like others. Legal hearer 11 vanquished this deterrent when legal hearer 8 was discussing the injury, he understood that the somebody taller would have needed to been the executioner. He additionally disclosed to the others that a switchblade is use in an upward movement. When these characters got over their hindrances, their basic reasoning aptitudes helped open gaps for the situation. With everything taken into account, Twelve Angry Men was an incredible learning apparatus to what basic reasoning is and how to apply. This film instructed me that you need to move toward choices in a specific way. I have to keep a receptive outlook, be practical, express my feelings and not judge others. Thinking fundamentally infers that mental ability of yours and your companions is expected to show signs of improvement comprehension of regular day to day existence. Regarding o thers around you is vital. So as to utilize basic reasoning, one must comprehend what it involves.

Lan Operating Systems Scenarios

Peruse the three situations beneath, at that point answer the inquiries that follow every situation. 1. You are the system manager for another organization that has 10 clients and plans to include five additional clients inside a year. The documents should be gotten to by every one of the 10 clients and every client must have distinctive security rights. What sort of system would you introduce and how might the pieces and segments of this system identify with one another? Characterize every segment. For this circumstance, I would initially suggest a server, which an executive can relegate diverse security rights. Second, I would suggest a star topology coordinate with a focal switch. A star topology is the simplest topology to oversee and include different gadgets. The switch is the best focal gadget to use to fragment traffic and reduce impacts that would happen from a center. The parts, for example, the hubs would interface with the switch, which would permit correspondence with different hubs or gadgets. Also, Ethernet links would be expected to associate with the rear of the PC or NIC card. 2. You are the system chairman for an organization that has a shared system. How might the pieces and parts of this system identify with one another? Characterize the entirety of the parts of this sort of system. In a distributed system, the entirety of the gadgets associated with the system share each other’s assets. This is normal in a LAN arrange that doesn't have a server. 3. You are the executive of a customer server condition. What sort of system would you introduce and how might the pieces and parts of this system identify with one another? Characterize every part of a run of the mill customer server condition. In this situation, I would again prescribe a star topology because of its sensibility and versatility. In this model, one would require PCs, server, links, and working frameworks. The hubs would experience the switch or switch and afterward that gadget would get those assets from the serever..

My First Week as an EMT

My First Week as an EMT This past Monday, I found out that I passed my national EMT exam.  I was so happy now I am officially a nationally certified firefighter and EMT!  Little did I know, my new skills as an EMT were going to be quickly tested. It started about 1am that night.  I had been getting in and out of bed and walking around, trying to force myself to fall asleep.  I have been having a lot of problems with sleeping lately, where it takes hours for me to fall asleep and it is really hard to stay asleep. At 1am, there was a knock at my door.  I am a Medlink in East Campus, and I believe very strongly that if people are sick on hall, they should feel comfortable coming and knocking on my door.  Many of us Medlinks in East Campus feel this way. That was what the knocking was about.  I asked who it was, and the girl at my door told me that she did not feel right.  I opened the door and let her in.  She sat on my floor, and I sat with her.  She said that she was having trouble sleeping, and felt really awful. A stabbing feeling in her stomach. I palpated her abdomen, like a fancy EMT, and it was fine other than the pain.  But it was the worst pain she had felt, unlike any other.  I helped her to her room.  I got a bowl from the kitchen and put a bag inside in case she felt like throwing up, and then got her a glass of water and some paper towels. On the way back to my room, I got called over by a friend down the hall.  He told me that he had just thrown up for the second time in two hours and felt awful.  This is when I realized that we might have an epidemic.  I went back to my room, scrubbed my hands clean with soap and water, and put on gloves.  I grabbed a bag, paper towels, some thermometers, and a cup of water.  I brought it back to the second patient, as he started vomiting into his trash can.  He told me to leave. At about 2:30am, I went back to bed.  There was not much more I could do, and I set my alarm for an hour later so I could check on the two patients again.  At about 3:15am, after trying to go to sleep for 45 minutes, there was another knock at my door. It was the boyfriend of patient 3.  He told me that she wasnt feeling well, and I knew exactly what it was.  I got out of bed, climbed down my loft, grabbed a bag, some paper towels, and followed him down the hall to her room.  There she was, extremely pale and feeling extremely sick.  I left her in the care of her boyfriend, and went down the hall to check on the others. Patient 2 was passed out.  I refilled his water, left him a new bag, checked his breathing rate, and let him sleep. I considered calling the ambulance. I woke up the other EMT on hall to ask her what to do.  She told me what she thought, and I let her sleep. Patient 1 was in a much worse state than before.  I got to her room just as she started vomiting, and I helped her make her way to the bathroom, bringing paper towels and helping her feel comfortable.  Afterwards, she felt a lot better. I cleaned up the bowl, and I put in a new bag. I helped her back to her room, where she curled up, still in pain. I encouraged tiny sips of water about every fifteen minutes afterwards. I told her that I thought she should go to the hospital, and she told me that she did not want to.  Nobody wanted to. I went back to my room.  I scrubbed my hands red.  I grabbed the Lysol on my shelf, and started going crazy.  I sprayed my sink, I sprayed my doorknobs. I sprayed my desk, the floor, parts of my loft. I sprayed the doors between each section of hall. The doorknobs and sinks of every bathroom, and every door leading into hall.  I sprayed the doorknobs of all the people I knew were sick, or could be sick. I discovered two new sick people as I went around disinfecting.  I got them bags, paper towels, cups of water. I went back to my room. I scrubbed my hands red.  I went into bed.  I sent texts to the ill, telling them to text me if they need me.  I got a text from my boyfriend, telling me that he just threw up and was feeling really awful. I got out of bed. I went down the stairs, Lysol in hand. I made sure he was okay I brought him a bag, paper towels, water.  I let him sleep. I went back upstairs, spraying everything with Lysol the door knobs, the railing. It was almost 5am.  I sent an e-mail to hall, but only to the residents as to not freak out the rest of the building. Hi guys, Theres a really bad stomach flu going around right now. Let me know if you are feeling ill, I will try to be around. Try to stay hydrated if you can, and go to medical if you start feeling sick. Mob leaving at 7am after I give them a call. Stay healthy (and away from other human beings) -array I got three immediate messages of new sick people. I went and checked on them I brought them bags, paper towels, water.  I lysoled their doors, their sinks, their light switches. I scrubbed my hands red.  I e-mailed the GRTs, warning them.  I e-mailed all the East Campus Medlinks, asking for help with getting Gatorade and Saltines and taking care of my residents telling them to keep their residents away, in case this is as incredibly infectious as it seems. At 7am, I called MIT Medical Urgent Care.  I spoke to the triage nurse, and she told me what to do. I sent an e-mail to East Campus residents. Hi, I am sending a warning about a sudden-onset stomach flu that is currently floating around the east parallel. MIT urgent care recommends that students who present symptoms of nausea, diarrhea or vomiting rest and try to sip clear fluids such as water, ginger ale, gatorade or broth. Please go to urgent care if you have the following: Vomiting/diarrhea that persists for many hours Inability to keep fluids down You have a fever or feel lightheaded when standing up If you are sick, please contact S^3 to get help with managing missed classes. They are going to encourage you to go to MIT Medical, but you do not need to go unless you have one of the symptoms above. As always, Urgent Care has walk-in hours 7am-11pm. You can also call 617-253-4481 at any time for medical advice. As always, dial x100 from a campus phone or 617-253-1212 for any emergency. Wash your hands! http://www.cdc.gov/handwashing/ Rachel (EC Medlink EMT) The response was worried residents.  I told them to wash their hands, and stay in if they felt sick.  Stay away from my floor we are quarantined for Tuesday and the foreseeable future. At this point, there were about 10 sick people on my hall.  The not-sick quickly responded there were trips to the super market organized.  Polls were sent and taken to try and figure out where this disease came from, and how many were infected. The virus had been found to present symptoms in at least two alum, infecting outside households.  I Lysoled the doorknobs, my boyfriend, the cats. A friend of the hall and former resident made us a huge pot of chicken soup, as well as a smaller pot of vegetarian soup.  People brought us Gatorade and Saltine crackers. Other Medlinks came and brought me thermometers. I went to Urgent Care to update the triage nurse she told me to continue what I was doing.  Check the pulse rates and the temperatures. My floor turned into an emergency room.  I went around leaving thermometers in peoples faces, pouring Gatorade powder here and there.  I missed all my classes.  I started to feel sort of funny, but told myself that there were more sick people and made it go away.  The count was over 15 sick people. I ran up and down the hall over and over again checking on people, until I was forced into my room and to bed and told to calm down and go to sleep. I scrubbed my hands red, showered, and took a two-hour nap.  I woke up, and I checked on my patients. People were starting to feel better.  It was the late afternoon, and I could see noticeable changes in mood, skin color, and overall feeling of the first patients.  They could keep down fluids and even some food, and things were looking up. I finished a problem set.  I tried and failed at studying for my exam on Friday.  I still felt a little funny, but chose to ignore it and, after putting a hosed, but healthy, senior on night duty and putting a sign on my door that I was not on shift, I scrubbed my hands red and went to sleep. Eight hours later, I woke up for class.  I went up and down the hall, checking on the patients.  There were four new patients over night.  I made sure they had Gatorade and were comfortable, and I went off to class. I went through the day in a daze, unable to focus on anything at all.  Worrying just worrying.  I felt off and I thought that I was doomed to come down with the virus.  I sent more warning e-mails to the Medlinks the disease spread slightly to a couple people in the other parallel, but otherwise seemed to be winding down. I got a nice e-mail of thanks from the Medlinks director.  I made an appointment with student support services for the next day.  I freaked out over a problem set that I thought was due that day. It was due the next day, Thursday. I did the problem set.  I felt off.  I did a case study for marketing. I tried and failed to study for my test on Friday. This is not my week. I went to sleep.  There were no knocks on my door, no frightening texts or calls in the middle of the night. I woke up, I went to class. I met with my awesome student support services officer.  I got an extension on my test. I went through the rest of my day in a daze, and I identified the source of my haziness to a new medication I was trying out.  I stopped taking it.  Things are clearer now. One new patient, patient number 20.  It has been over 24 hours since a new person has presented symptoms.  I hope this is over. I learned a few things over the past five days.  First of all, I really like being an EMT and Medlink.  Even though it was torturous at times, I really did like being there for my friends, and I think it is important that people have someone to go to when they are not feeling well.  I know that if I was sick I would want somebody checking on me, and I am glad that I can be there for other people. Second, my community is really awesome.  My hall really came together in the rough times making soup, bringing Gatorade and crackers to the doors of the ill.  It is amazing how generous and kind these people are, and I am so happy I live here. All along, the cats provided great emotional support, and probably helped with the spreading of disease.

Make the Most of Prep Over the Holidays

This blog post was contributed by Debbie Friedman, one of Compass most talented and experienced tutors. Debbie graduated from Brown University and currently works as both a tutor and a professional literary editor.   As the holidays approach, many students may be planning to jump-start their test prep. The question becomes: how can you best use your time? Some students may see the holidays as an oasis of free time to finally binge-prep, other students may become overwhelmed by expectations they’ve set for themselves, still others may want to be as far from test prep over their vacation as possible. The key, as with most things in life, is finding a balance. The majority of Compass students will be prepping over the holidays for the February or April ACT, so that will be my focus, but the takeaway for the SAT is similar: Break up the homework into smaller chunks and work on them more frequently. I can’t tell you how many of my students scramble to complete all of their homework, after not having looked at it for two weeks, right before I arrive. Conversely, I have a number of students who do all their work right after I assign it. This may seem like great time management, but the problem is similar—by the time we review homework, the concepts we’ve been working on have become hazy. While I can certainly sympathize with both approaches (I’ll admit to being more of a procrastinator myself), I see students succeed more readily with consistent practice. A major challenge of the ACT is pacing. The temptation some more eager students have is to repeatedly work through entire timed ACTs. And while I absolutely recommend timed practice tests, students should aim to take them about once a month, ideally proctored by Compass. Practicing the test by only sitting the full test can just reinforce bad habits (you wouldn’t, after all, train for a marathon by just running marathons, right?). A practical solution to working on both the pacing of the test and pacing your prep is to carve up the test and practice smaller amounts more frequently. Try picking two sections to focus on each night (e.g.: Science and English on Monday, Math and Reading on Tuesday). Break them up in the following ways: Science, Reading, and English, are all conveniently divided up into passages for you. Give yourself the goal to complete one passage. Then check your answers. See if you can figure out why you missed the problems you missed: Carelessness? Did you let one question suck up all your time? The timing breakdown is as follows: Science: 5 minutes per passage, Reading: 8 ½ minutes per passage, English: 9 minutes per passage. The Math section, however, can’t be broken up as easily into smaller chunks. Since the problems get more complex as the Math section goes on, the timing is not uniform, and not all students are even aiming to finish. However, there is still a lot to be said for working on, say, ten problems, then checking your answers. Understanding why you are missing problems is especially useful in the Math section. Are you making careless arithmetic mistakes? Or do you not remember certain formulas? The ACT Math section requires students to know a variety of concepts – from the Pythagorean Theorem to the difference of squares – and familiarity with these concepts and formulas is integral to your pacing. Take the time to review topics you’re shaky on—your work will go that much faster with these concepts fresh in your mind. You don’t want your entire holiday break taken up by test prep, and you don’t want the only test prep you’ve done to be six weeks (or more) before the actual test. The holidays are a great opportunity, not only to devote time to test prep, but to start setting habits for the weeks and months leading up to your test date.

The Song Ten Minutes Ago, Is From Rodgers And Hammerstein...

The song â€Å"Ten Minutes Ago† is from Rodgers and Hammerstein’s Cinderella. A musical adaption of the classic fairytale by the same name, it became a musical sensation when Richard Rodgers and Oscar Hammerstein transformed it into a live musical television broadcast in 1957. Starring Julie Andrews, it retold the fairytale of a young girl living a miserable life under the roof of her evil stepmother and her three equally vicious stepsisters. With the Prince’s Ball nearing, the four women in her family were planning to go, leaving Cinderella at home on the night of the ball. When all hope seemed lost, Cinderella’s Fairy Godmother appears, granting her wishes by transforming her from rags to riches, and giving her a pair of glass slippers. Cinderella was able to go to the ball unrecognized, under the condition to be home by midnight, when the spell wore off. At the ball, she meets the prince and there is immediately chemistry, but she rushes to leave before the clock strikes twelve, in fear of the prince seeing her for who she really was and being disgusted by her true self. As she escapes the castle, she loses one of her glass shoes on the steps of the castle. Leaving it behind, she makes it home without being seen by anyone, and resumes her life as a poor girl being abused by her family. The next day, the prince announces a search for Cinderella, not knowing her name or remembering her face. He went around town and asked women to try on the glass shoe, believing that he would